Jesus said to him, "I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father, but by Me. If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; henceforth you know Him and have seen Him."

Phillip said to him, "Lord, show us the Father, and we shall be satisfied."

Jesus said to him, "Have I been with you so long, and yet you do not know Me, Phillip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, 'Show us the Father'?"

"Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father in Me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does His works."

"Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me; or else believe Me for the sake of the works themselves." (John 14:6-11)

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST: Contributions to a Psychology of Jesus by Romano Guardini - Chapter I, Section 1

THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST


I. THE SETTING AND THE LIFE

1. THE HISTORICAL SITUATION

Almost everything we know about Jesus comes from the New Testament, above

all from the Gospels. These are not historical narratives in the modern

sense- They do not even set out to provide edifying biographies written

according to a unified scheme. They are a holy message.


Without attempting to achieve sequence and completeness, they record

events, sayings, and actions in the life of our Lord, presenting them

according to their significance for the proclamation of the message of

salvation. Thus, from the standpoint of historical biography, the facts

which we learn from the Gospels about the life of Jesus are at once

accidental and precious.



The scene of Jesus' life is Palestine. because in the later and more

important part of his life he moved about with considerable freedom, the

story takes us to widely different regions. First there is the immediate

homecountry--Galilee; then the capital with the surrounding province of

Judaea; the solitude of the wilderness and the banks of Jordan; Samaria and

the Syrian frontier. It is true that the account shows no interest in

things which are not immediately connected with the holy message of

salvation, and yet it throws light now and again upon the conditions of the

country; upon the peculiarities of the different regions with the tensions

which exist between them; upon occasional geographical and historical

points of interest.



The time limits of Jesus' life are determined by certain statements in the

Gospels. He was born during the reign of Augustus Caesar, Quirinius being

governor in Syria, and Herod, the King of Galilee, under Roman vassalage.

We cannot fix the year exactly (Luke 2. 1-2; Mat. 2. 1). His public

activity began after the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar,

i.e. after the year 28; for it was in this year that John the Baptist began

to preach, and Jesus appeared after that. Jesus was then about thirty years

old (Luke 3. 1-3, 23). He died, at the latest, before Easter of the year

35, for his death occurred while Pontius Pilate was in office, and by

Easter 36 Pilate's term was over (Mat. 27. 11-26 et par.). Jesus lived,

then, between these extreme dates. More exact dating depends upon how long

we allow for the Baptist's and his own ministries, and how we interpret the

statements of the various Gospels concerning his journeyings to Jerusalem.

The highest reckoning puts the duration of Jesus' public life at about

three years; the lowest at a little over one.



The reigns of Caesar Augustus (29 B.C.-14 A.D.) and Tiberius Caesar (A.D.

14-37) form the historical framework of our Lord's life. All the world,

from Gibraltar to Mesopotamia, from Britain to Ethiopia, was a single

political entity. A multiplicity of local cultures was held together by

strong unifying forces, above all by a view of life which blended

Hellenistic intellectualism with Roman practicality. Greek and Latin were

spoken everywhere. Political ordinances, a uniform administration, and

commercial intercourse guaranteed a constant interchange between the

different parts of the Empire. The religious scene presents a vast

diversity; but the separate pagan cults had long since lost their sharp

dividing lines. All of them had become imbued with certain tendencies,

notably a predilection for myths and mysteries. A deep longing for

redemption was felt everywhere, and this led to all kinds of syncretism.



The rulers of Palestine were the sons and heirs of Herod the Great (d. 4

B.C.). Judaea and Samaria were ruled by Archelaus (4 B.C.-6 A.D.) until his

banishment, when Judaea was made a Roman proconsulate under Quirinius.

Herod Antipas (4 B.C.-39 A.D.) ruled in Galilee and Peraea. Philip (4 B.C.-

34 A.D.) ruled in the North-east, but his area, too, was destined to come

under immediate Roman rule. The country's political independence, won by

the Maccabees in the wars of freedom (167-142 B.C.), and upheld by the

Hasmonaean dynasty, had been brought to an end by Pompey. From 63 B.C.

onwards Palestine was a Roman province. Herod the Great himself had been a

Roman vassal.



Despite this political dependence, however, a considerable spiritual

independence persisted. The form of government was still the old theocracy,

exercised by the high priest assisted by the supreme council of the

Sanhedrin, composed of seventy-one members.



Supreme jurisdiction in matters involving the death sentence and crimes of

a political nature was reserved to the Roman governor, as was taxation.

Religious life was founded on a tradition which had withstood all change.



At the same time, a whole series of Greek and Asiatic influences had made

themselves felt. The danger of hellenization may well have been warded off

by the Maccabean wars and the country safeguarded for Judaism; but

Palestine, too, was affected by Hellenistic culture, as well as by a

religious movement which stirred the whole Mediterranean world, revealing

itself in Palestine principally as a fervent longing for the Messiah, an

expectation which was not purely religious but also strongly nationalist

and political in tone.



The guardians of the nationalist-conservative tradition were the Pharisees.

They were the purists, those who remained faithful to the Law. They were

vigorously against all that was foreign and pagan; and they were the

bitterest opponents of Hellenistic culture. And yet, for all their national

consciousness, they were not really in touch with the people, but looked

down on them as a despicable, confused, and ignorant rabble.



Opposed to them was the party of the Sadducees who were cosmopolitan and

supported Hellenistic culture, seeing themselves as the enlightened,

rationalist opponents of all that claimed to be above the senses or beyond

this world.



Their image merges with that of the Hellenizers, the group that adapted

traditional Jewish ideas to the popular philosophy of the times, and whose

attitude to the Law was determined by this adaptation. The Sadducees were

related also to the Herodians--members of the courts of Herod's heirs, who

had no interest in serious issues but sought only power and pleasure.



A number of other well-defined groups stood out from the mass of the

population.



Most conspicuous were the Essenes, a sect of a decidedly mystical and

ascetic character.



John the Baptist's disciples seem to have had much in common with these

people and while some of them adopted their masters attitude to Jesus,

others continued as a separate community.



Besides these, we must take note of that little band that remained firmly

within the ancient tradition, but drew its inspiration rather from the

Prophets and the Psalms than from the Law- These were men and women of

deep, quiet spirituality like Zachary and Elizabeth, the parents of John

the Baptist; or the two prophetic souls who greeted the Child Jesus in the

Temple, Simeon and Anna; or the family at Bethany, Lazarus, Martha and Mary

(John 11).



Finally, there were the Samaritans, a racially and religiously hybrid

group, the descendants of colonists who had been transplanted there at the

time of the Assyrian conquest- They tried to hold themselves aloof from

both Jews and pagans, but were unable to do so because of the confusing

forces all about them. They were despised by their Jewish neighbors.